introduction: in the face of this kind of case

introduction: in the face of this kind of case, the trial justice could not refuse, but the referee are likely to end up in the legality of administrative acts, and to play to respond to public issues. is expected to open the trial will be special legal grey zone, or is placed high hopes on the judicial authority. The final car, had to resort to legislation. special concern the first case of the recent trial in Ji’nan. Drivers Chen Chao law enforcement officers were fined 20000 yuan due to see a visitor out, will Ji’nan city public passenger transport management center court. An administrative litigation will be prominent legal disputes about the car. On the court, the two sides around the punishment procedures, penalties according to the fact whether the legality of the full focus of debate, the court will ultimately decide also can make nothing of it. recently around the car over, from the Nanjing taxi strike shipped to Shanghai and then to car, physical conflict occurred in Taiyuan car drivers with the law enforcement officers in the car, to facilitate travel at the same time also in the great risk of illegal operation. This case is the core issue is to attract people’s attention, this kind of reality of the car: Car dilemma on behalf of the mobile Internet booking car way Shi Bushi black car? Car and car where to draw the line? From the bus operator to taxi operators to ordinary people, are looking forward to the law can give a clear statement. therefore, this case will be the public’s expectations into the judicial field. People look forward to the gray zone of judicial decisions can let the car out of the law, establish clear rules. A society in legal disputes to hear the voice of the court is a good thing, but the court may not be able to take up this well intentioned, because in our country, the judicial settlement of disputes are often only on the case, it is difficult for the society to create a new deterministic rules. this is a very tangled state. Especially in the period of social transition, the legal system is not yet mature, to a lot of social innovation behavior evaluation is not clear, because the change of administration functions are not in place, resulting in such a phenomenon: when the lack of specific legal regulations on certain types of behavior, law enforcement may be in doubt on the legitimacy of the punishment behavior in advance, once the case into the judicial process, the social value judgment on the behavior itself will be transferred to the judicial judgment, to find legal basis from the judgment. This is where the judicial institution transformation dilemma. in the face of this kind of case, the trial justice could not refuse, but the referee are likely to end up in the legality of administrative acts, and to play to respond to public issues. In fact, in this case from the focus of the debate on the trial the defendant can also be seen, judicial proceedings of

LEAVE A COMMENT